Fastify is what happens when you prioritize performance without sacrificing developer experience. While Express is the popular choice, Fastify is the fast choice. The name isn't marketing—this framework is genuinely fast, often 2-3x faster than Express in benchmarks. But here's what's interesting: it's not fast because it's bare-bones. Fastify includes built-in schema validation, a plugin system, and TypeScript support. The performance comes from smart design—efficient request handling, minimal overhead, and a plugin architecture that doesn't slow you down. If you're building APIs that need to handle serious traffic, Fastify is worth considering. It's like Express, but faster. And who doesn't want that?
Performance matters. When you're handling thousands of requests per second, a 2-3x speed improvement isn't just nice to have—it's the difference between scaling and struggling. Fastify delivers that performance without making you write assembly code. The built-in schema validation means you get type safety and validation out of the box. The plugin system is clean and doesn't add overhead. We've built Fastify APIs that handle real traffic, and the performance difference is noticeable. If Express is fast enough for your needs, great. But if you're pushing performance limits, Fastify is worth the switch.
Performance Improvement
Fastify benchmarksWeekly Downloads
npm statisticsGitHub Stars
GitHubRequest Throughput
Performance benchmarksExceptional performance with 2-3x better throughput than Express.js in many scenarios, making it ideal for high-traffic applications
Built-in JSON schema validation provides request/response validation out of the box, reducing the need for additional validation libraries
Plugin architecture allows adding functionality through plugins while maintaining performance, enabling modular and efficient application development
TypeScript support with comprehensive type definitions that provide excellent IDE support and catch errors at compile time
Low overhead design minimizes resource usage, making Fastify efficient for microservices and serverless functions
Active development and community with regular updates, performance improvements, and growing ecosystem that keeps the framework current
Excellent developer experience with helpful error messages, comprehensive documentation, and tooling that speeds up development
Schema-based approach ensures type safety and validation throughout the application, reducing bugs and improving reliability
Fastify's performance-first approach makes it ideal for specific scenarios where speed, efficiency, and high throughput are priorities. The framework excels when you're building high-performance APIs, microservices, or applications that need to handle high traffic with minimal resources. Based on our experience building Fastify applications for performance-critical projects, we've identified the ideal use cases—and situations where other frameworks might be more appropriate.

APIs that need to handle high traffic benefit from Fastify's performance. We've built Fastify APIs that handle thousands of requests per second efficiently with minimal resource usage.
Microservices benefit from Fastify's low overhead and performance. We've built Fastify microservices that communicate efficiently and scale independently with minimal resource usage.
Real-time applications that need high throughput benefit from Fastify's performance. We've built Fastify real-time applications that handle concurrent connections efficiently.
Serverless functions benefit from Fastify's fast startup times and low overhead. We've built Fastify serverless functions that execute quickly and cost-effectively.
Applications processing lots of data benefit from Fastify's efficient request handling. We've built Fastify applications that process data efficiently without performance bottlenecks.
Teams that prioritize performance above all else benefit from Fastify's speed. We've built Fastify applications for teams that need maximum performance and are willing to learn Fastify's patterns.
We believe in honest communication. Here are scenarios where alternative solutions might be more appropriate:
Simple applications—Fastify's performance benefits are most apparent in high-traffic scenarios, so simpler applications might not need it
Teams needing maximum ecosystem—Express.js has a larger ecosystem, which might be more important than performance for some projects
Projects requiring extensive middleware—while Fastify has plugins, Express.js has more middleware options
Applications with simple requirements—for simple APIs, Express.js might be more practical
We're here to help you find the right solution. Let's have an honest conversation about your specific needs and determine if Fastify is the right fit for your business.
REST APIs that need to handle high traffic benefit from Fastify's performance. We've built Fastify REST APIs that handle thousands of requests per second efficiently with minimal resource usage.
Example: High-traffic REST API handling millions of requests with Fastify
Microservices benefit from Fastify's low overhead and performance. We've built Fastify microservices that communicate efficiently and scale independently with minimal resource usage.
Example: Microservices architecture with Fastify services for high performance
Applications processing real-time data benefit from Fastify's efficient request handling. We've built Fastify applications that process streaming data efficiently without performance bottlenecks.
Example: Real-time data processing service with high throughput
Serverless functions benefit from Fastify's fast startup times and low overhead. We've built Fastify serverless functions that execute quickly and cost-effectively on cloud platforms.
Example: Serverless API functions with fast cold starts and low memory usage
IoT applications that process data from many devices benefit from Fastify's performance. We've built Fastify IoT backends that handle device data efficiently with minimal latency.
Example: IoT platform processing data from thousands of devices
Financial applications requiring low latency benefit from Fastify's performance. We've built Fastify APIs for financial services that require minimal latency and high throughput.
Example: Trading API with minimal latency and high request throughput
Every technology has its strengths and limitations. Here's an honest assessment to help you make an informed decision.
Fastify is one of the fastest Node.js frameworks, with 2-3x better performance than Express.js in many scenarios. This makes it ideal for high-traffic applications. We've built Fastify applications that achieve excellent performance.
Fastify includes built-in JSON schema validation that provides request/response validation out of the box. This reduces the need for additional validation libraries and ensures type safety. We've leveraged Fastify's validation extensively.
Fastify's plugin architecture allows adding functionality through plugins while maintaining performance. This enables modular and efficient application development. We've built Fastify applications with sophisticated plugin compositions.
Fastify's design minimizes resource usage, making it efficient for microservices and serverless functions. The framework has minimal overhead compared to other frameworks. We've built Fastify applications with excellent resource efficiency.
Fastify has excellent TypeScript support with comprehensive type definitions. This provides excellent IDE support and catches errors at compile time. We use TypeScript with Fastify in all our projects.
Fastify has active development with regular updates and performance improvements. The framework continues to improve and stay current with best practices. We've benefited from Fastify's active development.
Fastify has a smaller ecosystem compared to Express.js, meaning fewer plugins and resources available. For specific needs, you might find fewer options or need to build custom solutions.
We work with Fastify's ecosystem and build custom solutions when needed. While the ecosystem is smaller, it's growing, and we've found that most common needs are covered. For projects requiring extensive ecosystem support, we can recommend alternatives.
Fastify's plugin architecture and schema validation require understanding new concepts. While the learning curve is manageable, it does require time investment, especially for teams new to Fastify.
We provide Fastify training and documentation. We help teams understand Fastify's concepts and best practices. The learning curve is manageable, and Fastify's excellent documentation makes learning easier.
Fastify is less established than Express.js, which means less proven track record and fewer resources. While Fastify is production-ready, it has less history than Express.js.
While Fastify is less established, it's stable and production-ready. We've built production Fastify applications successfully, and the framework's performance and quality make it suitable for production use. We help clients evaluate whether Fastify fits their needs.
Fastify's schema-based approach requires defining schemas for validation, which can add overhead for simple APIs. While schemas provide benefits, they require more upfront work.
We use Fastify's schema validation effectively, creating reusable schemas and patterns that minimize overhead. The validation benefits often outweigh the schema definition overhead, and we structure schemas efficiently.
Every technology has its place. Here's how Fastify compares to other popular options to help you make the right choice.
Express.js is better for simple APIs, rapid development, and projects needing a larger ecosystem. However, for high-performance applications, maximum throughput, and built-in validation, Fastify is better. For performance-critical projects, Fastify provides significant advantages.
NestJS is better for enterprise applications requiring structure and comprehensive features. However, for maximum performance, high throughput, and minimal overhead, Fastify is better. For performance-critical applications, Fastify provides significant advantages.
Koa is better for modern applications with complex async flows. However, for maximum performance and built-in validation, Fastify is better. For performance-critical applications, Fastify provides significant advantages.
Fastify is fast, but building production-ready Fastify apps requires more than just speed. We've built Fastify applications that started fast and stayed fast under real load. The framework gives you performance, but you still need to structure code properly, handle errors gracefully, and design APIs that scale. We know how to leverage Fastify's plugin system effectively. We understand when schema validation helps and when it doesn't. We've learned the patterns that keep Fastify apps fast as they grow. Our Fastify apps aren't just fast; they're fast and maintainable.
We optimize Fastify applications to achieve maximum performance and minimal resource usage. Our team understands Fastify's performance characteristics and leverages them effectively. We've built Fastify applications that achieve exceptional performance with minimal overhead.
We leverage Fastify's built-in schema validation to ensure type safety and request/response validation. Our team creates comprehensive schemas that provide validation and type safety throughout applications. We've built Fastify applications with excellent validation.
We develop custom Fastify plugins and integrate third-party plugins effectively. Our team understands Fastify's plugin architecture and uses it to add functionality efficiently. We've built Fastify applications with sophisticated plugin compositions.
We build high-performance APIs with Fastify that follow best practices for API design, authentication, and error handling. Our team implements proper API patterns and ensures APIs are well-documented and maintainable. We've built many Fastify APIs successfully.
We design and build Fastify microservices that communicate efficiently and scale independently. Our team understands microservices patterns and implements them effectively with Fastify's performance advantages. We've built Fastify microservices architectures successfully.
We optimize Fastify applications for minimal resource usage, making them efficient for microservices and serverless functions. Our team monitors resource usage and implements optimizations. We've achieved significant resource efficiency in Fastify projects.
Have questions? We've got answers. Here are the most common questions we receive about Fastify.
Yes, Fastify is significantly faster than Express.js in most scenarios, with benchmarks showing 2-3x better performance. Fastify achieves this through efficient request handling, JSON schema validation, and minimal overhead. We've seen significant performance improvements in Fastify applications.
Yes, Fastify has excellent TypeScript support with comprehensive type definitions. You can use TypeScript in Fastify applications for type safety and better developer experience. We use TypeScript with Fastify in all our projects.
Fastify is designed for performance with built-in validation and plugin architecture, while Express.js is more flexible with a larger ecosystem. Fastify is better for high-performance applications, while Express.js is better for rapid development and ecosystem support.
Yes, Fastify is designed to handle high traffic efficiently. We've built Fastify applications that handle thousands of requests per second with minimal resource usage. Fastify's performance makes it ideal for high-traffic applications.
Great question! The cost really depends on what you need—project complexity, performance requirements, API needs, validation requirements, timeline, and team experience. Instead of giving you a generic price range, we'd love to hear about your specific project. Share your requirements with us, and we'll analyze everything, understand what you're trying to build, and then give you a detailed breakdown of the pricing and costs. That way, you'll know exactly what you're paying for and why.
We use Fastify's built-in JSON schema validation to validate requests and responses. Fastify's schema validation provides type safety and validation out of the box. We create comprehensive schemas that ensure data integrity throughout applications.
Yes, Fastify is excellent for microservices due to its low overhead and performance. We've built Fastify microservices that communicate efficiently and scale independently with minimal resource usage.
Fastify uses plugins instead of middleware, which provide similar functionality with better performance. Plugins can be composed and reused, making them more efficient than traditional middleware. We use Fastify plugins effectively in our projects.
We structure Fastify applications using plugins organized by feature or domain. Each plugin encapsulates related functionality, ensuring clear separation of concerns. We use Fastify's plugin architecture to create maintainable applications.
We offer various support packages including Fastify updates, performance optimization, plugin development, and Fastify best practices consulting. Our support packages are flexible and can be customized based on your needs. We also provide Fastify training and documentation to ensure your team can work effectively with Fastify.
Still have questions?
Contact UsExplore related technologies that work seamlessly together to build powerful solutions.

Here's the thing: anyone can write fast code. Writing fast code that stays fast as your app grows? That's harder. We've seen Fastify projects that were blazing fast at launch but slowed down as features were added. We build Fastify apps that maintain performance. We optimize for the long term, not just the demo. We structure code so performance optimizations are maintainable. When we hand off a Fastify project, you get speed that lasts.